It is a well known fact that literature has always been the wealth of
our country. Indian classical arts and literature go hand in hand.
Many dance treatises have been written by ancient Indian authors (not
dancers) that are popular even today as handbooks and encyclopaedias.
One such piece of literature is Bharata Muni’s Natyashastra. It is
believed to be one of the oldest treatises and the one which talks about
all Indian arts combined; viz dance, drama and music. It contains
information as well as courses of action so as to help artists design
their performance. The Natyashastra talks about how an ideal auditorium
should be, and also gives detailed information about the various kinds
of plays that can be performed. With dance in mind, Bharata lays down
certain guidelines regarding use of hand gestures (mudras), eye
movements (drishti bheda), movements and positions of feet (pada bheda
and charis), postures arising due to combination of the above (karanas)
etc.
In the layman’s terms, “Nayika” means a heroine; the principal subject of any storyline. But does Bharata Muni have the same conception in mind while he describes the Nayikas? I think the answer is negative; the obvious reason being that the text was written sometime between 200 BC and 400 AD, and with the then status of women in mind.
Read the article in the site
In the layman’s terms, “Nayika” means a heroine; the principal subject of any storyline. But does Bharata Muni have the same conception in mind while he describes the Nayikas? I think the answer is negative; the obvious reason being that the text was written sometime between 200 BC and 400 AD, and with the then status of women in mind.
Read the article in the site
I agree with this point of view. I had presented a paper recently in a seminar but the response was only on technical details and no comments on the main subject. I am happy to read this article which ascertains these views.
ReplyDelete